A Comparative Study on Dual-phase Enhanced CT, CT Perfusion and Histopathology in Edges of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Authors

  • Rongjie Bai Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, the Fourth Clinical Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
  • Jinping Li Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
  • Shaohua Ren Department of Radiology, the First Hospital of Harbin, Harbin, China
  • HuiJie Jiang Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
  • Xinding Liu Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
  • Zaisheng Ling Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China

Keywords:

Hepatocellular carcinoma, Tomography, X-ray computer, Histopathology, Perfusion imaging

Abstract

Background: The morphological characteristics of HCC edge not only predict the biological behavior of the tumor, but also determine the treatment.

Method: 47 cases of HCC borders were divided into three morphological types based on enhanced CT findings. Clear edges (Type I): The tumor boundary was clearly displayed at dual-phase CT. Blurry edges (Type II): The boundary between tumor and normal liver tissues was blurry at dual-phase CT. Mixed type (Type III): Part of tumor edge was clear or had an incomplete capsule formation, another part of tumor edge had a blurry boundary with normal liver tissues, and the above two types of performance were seen at dual-phase CT. All patients underwent CT perfusion (CTP) imaging. The correlations between microvessel density (MVD) and the CTP parameters were analyzed.

Results: In 47 cases of HCC, the MVD in edge areas of type II was higher than that in type I, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05).The MVD in clear edge areas of type III was lower than that in Blurry edges (P <0.01). Positive linear correlations existed between the values of HAP, HAF, and HBF versus MVD (P < 0.05). HPP showed a negative correlation with MVD measurements (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The CT classification of the tumor edges can roughly evaluate the characteristics of the tumors at the macro level, and the CTP imaging in tumor edges can acquire more information at the micro level and reflect the tumor characteristics more specifically and comprehensively.

References

1. Pandharipande PV, Krinsky GA, Rusinek H, Lee VS. Perfusion imaging of the liver: current challenges and future goals. Radiology, 2005; 234: 661-73.

2. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Rossi P, Mangiapane F, Murakami T, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: role of unenhanced and delayed phase multi-detector row helical CT in patients with cirrhosis. Radiology, 2005; 234: 460-7.

3. Jiang T, Kambadakone A, Kulkarni NM, Zhu AX, Sahani DV. Monitoring response to antiangiogenic treatment and predicting outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using image biomarkers, CT perfusion, tumor density, and tumor size (RECIST). Investigative radiology, 2012; 47: 11-7.

4. Ippolito D, Capraro C, Casiraghi A, Cestari C, Sironi S. Quantitative assessment of tumour associated neovascularisation in patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: role of dynamic-CT perfusion imaging. European radiology, 2012; 22: 803-11.

5. Hennedige T, Venkatesh SK. Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis, staging and treatment monitoring. Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2013; 12: 530-47.

6. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis--correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. The New England journal of medicine, 1991; 324: 1-8.

7. Karahan OI, Yikilmaz A, Isin S, Orhan S. Characterization of hepatocellular carcinomas with triphasic CT and correlation with histopathologic findings. Acta radiologica, 2003; 44: 566-71.

8. Kim HC, Kim TK, Sung KB, Yoon HK, Kim PN, Ha HK, et al. Preoperative evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma: combined use of CT with arterial portography and hepatic arteriography. AJR American journal of roentgenology, 2003; 180: 1593-9.

9. Fukumura D, Jain RK. Imaging angiogenesis and the microenvironment. APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2008; 116: 695-715.

10. Imura S, Miyake H, Izumi K, Tashiro S, Uehara H. Correlation of vascular endothelial cell proliferation with microvessel density and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor in hepatocellular carcinoma. The journal of medical investigation : JMI, 2004; 51: 202-9.

11. Ippolito D, Sironi S, Pozzi M, Antolini L, Invernizzi F, Ratti L, et al. Perfusion CT in cirrhotic patients with early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of tumor-related vascularization. European journal of radiology, 2010; 73: 148-52.

12. Ippolito D, Sironi S, Pozzi M, Antolini L, Ratti L, Alberzoni C, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver disease: functional computed tomography with perfusion imaging in the assessment of tumor vascularization. Academic radiology, 2008; 15: 919-27.

13. Yang HF, Du Y, Ni JX, Zhou XP, Li JD, Zhang Q, et al. Perfusion computed tomography evaluation of angiogenesis in liver cancer. European radiology, 2010; 20: 1424-30.

Downloads

Published

2014-04-01

How to Cite

Rongjie Bai, Jinping Li, Shaohua Ren, HuiJie Jiang, Xinding Liu, & Zaisheng Ling. (2014). A Comparative Study on Dual-phase Enhanced CT, CT Perfusion and Histopathology in Edges of Hepatocellular Carcinoma . International Journal of Medical Research, 2(02), 20–26. Retrieved from https://ijmrinternational.in/index.php/ijmr/article/view/37

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles