EVALUATION OF HEPATITIS C VIRUS GENOTYPING PROTOCOLS FOR USE IN A DIAGNOSTIC SETTING

Authors

  • Isaac Thom Shawa University of Malawi College of Medicine, Pathology department, P/Bag 360 Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi
  • Mark Hopkins Royal Liverpool University Hospital (RLUH), Virology department Duncan Building, Prescot Street, Liverpool L7 8XP

Keywords:

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Sequencing, Genotyping, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), Malawi, Liverpool

Abstract

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been reported to be the most common cause of chronic viral Hepatitis with increased prevalence rate worldwide. HCV genotype is an important predictive factor in the outcome of HCV treatment, therefore an essential component of clinical practice. Molecular methods are the most common diagnostic tools for HCV genotyping. HCV genotype might also have relevance for newer antiviral therapies in development.

Objectives: To develop and evaluate new cost-effective molecular methods for HCV genotyping using analytical instruments which were in place at Royal Liverpool University Hospital (RLUH) and to assess their sensitivity and specificity.

Methods: The plasma or serum RNA purification was done by automated QIAsymphony and QIAcube equipment. PCR assays capable of detecting and distinguishing HCV genotype by nucleotide probe or melt analysis were compared. The two-step PCR and one-step real-time PCR methods were assessed. The NS5B PCR was used to amplify the 5'NTR region of HCV for sequencing using Qiagen RT-PCT kit. The method was evaluated using HCV genomic sequence data as the gold standard.

Results: In preliminary PCR assessments, two-step real-time PCR amplified the products but could not be continued as efforts were made to assess and improve the one-step RT-PCR method for diagnostic purposes. Out a total of 71 samples 65 gave definitive genotype results, 59 were concordant and 6 mismatched. The discordant samples were repeated to confirm the genotypes but the results were similar. 6 samples could not be amplified. A Kappa value of 0.869 (p<0.001) indicating a 90.8 percent agreement was obtained. The sensitivity and specificity were 91.5% and 100% respectively.

Conclusions: The PCR amplification of NS5B HCV regions showed that the method is capable of detecting HCV genotypes, however it is unable to discriminate mixed genotypes. Whereas real-time PCR method is capable of detecting mixed genotypes, the genotype call may be less reliable. On the other hand, the sequencing method used in this study has an inherent limitation of giving definitive genotypes one at a time. Further efforts should be made to develop the real-time PCR to detect mixed genotypes.

References

1. Tellinghuisen TL and Lindenbach BD. Reverse transcription PCR-based sequence analysis of hepatitis C virus replicon RNA. Method Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ). 2009; 510, 165.

2. Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Dunlap PV and Clark DP. Brock Biology of microorganisms 12th edn. International Microbiology. 2008; 11, 65-73.

3. Bullock GC, Bruns DE and Haverstick DM. Hepatitis C genotype determination by melting curve analysis with a single set of fluorescence resonance energy transfer probes. Clin Chem. 2002; 48(12), 2147.

4. Dryer PD, Limketkai BN, Martin CM, Ma G, Sherman KE, Taylor LE et al. Screening for hepatitis C virus non-nucleotide resistance mutations in treatment-naive women. J Antimicrob Chemoth. 2009.

5. Knipe D, Howley P, Griffin D, Lamb R, Martin M, Roizman B et al. Fields virology, vol. 1. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2007.

6. Charavay C, Crisan D, Grando D, Geourjon C, Penin F, Deléage G et al. The European Hepatitis C Virus database. 2008.

7. Barril G, Castillo I, Arenas MD, Espinosa M, Garcia-Valdecasas J, Garcia-Fernandez N, et al. Occult hepatitis C virus infection among hemodialysis patients. J AM Soc Nephro. 2008; 19(12), 2288.

8. Menegazzi P, Reho E, Ulivi M, Varnier OE, Lillo FB and Tagliaferro L. Rapid and accurate quantification of different HCV genotypes by LightCycler Real Time PCR and direct sequencing of HCV amplicons. New Microbiol. 2008; 31, 181-187.

9. Cook L, Sullivan KW, Krantz EM, Bagabag A and Jerome KR. Multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay for determination of hepatitis C virus genotypes. J clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(11), 4149.

10. Lindh M and Hannoun C. Genotyping of hepatitis C virus by Taqman real-time PCR. J Clin Virol. 2005; 34(2), 108-114.

11. Hartwell D and Shepherd J. Pegylated and non-pegylated interferon-alfa and ribavirin for the treatment of mild chronic hepatitis C: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess. 2009; 25(01), 56-62.

12. Alfaresi, M. and Elkoush, A. Determination of hepatitis C virus genotypes by melting-curve analysis of quantitative polymerase chain reaction products. Indian J Med Microbi. 2007; 25(3), 249.

13. Rolfe KJ, Wreghitt TG, Alexander G and Curran MD. A real-time Taqman method for hepatitis C virus genotyping and methods for further subtyping of isolates. Method Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ). 2009; 510, 55.

14. Martro E, Gonzalez V, Buckton AJ, Saludes V, Fernandez G, Matas L et al. Evaluation of a new assay for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping targeting both 5'NC and NS5b genomic regions, in comparison with reverse hybridization and sequencing methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2007.

15. Omrani MD and Ansari MHK. Hepatitis C Virus Genotyping by Melting Curve Analysis in West Azerbaijan, Northwest of Iran. Hepatitis Monthly. 2009; 9(2), 133-136.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-01

How to Cite

Isaac Thom Shawa, & Hopkins, M. (2013). EVALUATION OF HEPATITIS C VIRUS GENOTYPING PROTOCOLS FOR USE IN A DIAGNOSTIC SETTING. International Journal of Medical Research, 1(01), 2–7. Retrieved from https://ijmrinternational.in/index.php/ijmr/article/view/14

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles